Comparison of Multi-Query and Multi-Head Attention

Posted by

Multi-Query vs Multi-Head Attention

Attention mechanisms have become a crucial component in many deep learning architectures, especially in natural language processing tasks such as machine translation and sentiment analysis. One common type of attention mechanism is the multi-query attention, which allows the model to pay attention to multiple aspects of the input at the same time.

However, a more recent and advanced version of attention is the multi-head attention. This type of attention mechanism extends the idea of multi-query attention by using multiple sets of query, key, and value matrices to compute multiple sets of attention scores in parallel. This allows the model to capture different facets of the input simultaneously, leading to better performance in many tasks.

One key difference between multi-query and multi-head attention is the level of parallelism they offer. While multi-query attention operates on a single set of query, key, and value matrices, multi-head attention operates on multiple sets of these matrices in parallel. This enables the model to attend to different parts of the input independently, improving its ability to capture complex relationships and dependencies within the data.

Another advantage of multi-head attention is its ability to learn more diverse and expressive representations of the input. By computing multiple sets of attention scores and combining them in a weighted sum, multi-head attention is able to capture a wider range of features and patterns in the data, leading to more robust and accurate predictions.

In conclusion, while both multi-query and multi-head attention are effective mechanisms for capturing relationships within the input, multi-head attention offers the added benefits of increased parallelism and expressive power. As deep learning models continue to evolve, it is likely that multi-head attention will become the standard choice for many natural language processing tasks.