Jack Smith’s Significant Action Before Supreme Court in Trump Criminal Case Sparks Attention

Posted by

In a shocking turn of events, Jack Smith, the lead attorney for former President Donald Trump in his criminal case before the Supreme Court, has made a major move that could have significant implications for the ongoing legal battle.

Smith, a high-profile and well-respected lawyer, filed a motion with the Supreme Court on Friday seeking to present new evidence in the case. The evidence in question reportedly includes documents and witness statements that could potentially exonerate Trump and change the course of the proceedings.

The move comes as a surprise to many, as the case appeared to be at a standstill with both sides presenting their arguments and evidence in previous hearings. However, Smith’s decision to introduce new evidence indicates that there may be more to the case than meets the eye.

The nature of the new evidence has not been disclosed, but sources close to the case indicate that it could be related to the alleged incitement of the Capitol riot on January 6th, 2021. Trump has been accused of encouraging his supporters to march on the Capitol and protest the certification of the 2020 presidential election results, leading to a violent insurrection that resulted in multiple deaths and widespread damage.

The addition of new evidence at this stage of the proceedings is highly unusual and has raised questions about the validity and admissibility of the materials. It remains to be seen how the Supreme Court will respond to Smith’s motion and whether they will allow the new evidence to be presented in court.

The development has sent shockwaves through the legal community and has reignited public interest in the case. Many are eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision on whether to accept the new evidence and how it will impact the trajectory of the trial.

Smith’s bold move is a clear indication that he and his legal team are not backing down without a fight. They are determined to explore every possible avenue to defend their client and challenge the allegations against him.

As the legal drama continues to unfold, all eyes will be on the Supreme Court as they navigate this unprecedented twist in one of the most high-profile criminal cases in recent memory. The outcome of Smith’s motion could have far-reaching consequences for Trump and the future of his legal battles. Only time will tell how the Supreme Court will ultimately rule on the matter and what it means for the former president’s criminal case.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
@MeidasTouch
8 months ago

Listen to the MeidasTouch Podcast for more: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast
To get way more shows and save money while you’re at it go to https://ExpressVPN.com/meidastouch

@RonaldHill-wo3yb
8 months ago

Jack smith is not an officer of the court was not appointed by congress or the senate and his horseshit got shutdown. jack smith was illegally put there by marrack garland who exceded his authority.

@RitaGalindo-zv1bi
8 months ago

Amen 🙏🙏

@user-bf7cl8ed7p
8 months ago

If trump doesn't spend time in prison the rule of law is gone

@jeffboyd2312
8 months ago

Good get that crook

@JonathanMurray-qu9tj
8 months ago

This is wrong they need to go through the normal votes what happened to the votes thst were pit aside buy the government the case was held up but the voyed were counted those voyes need to be tsken out of the votor roll and trump won .hes right .why wont they take the vote off the tslly .please no one will take the voyes awwsy that were counted

@marksullivan4971
8 months ago

Every single moron in America thinks this is good news because of the Trump appointees on the SCOTUS and the other corrupt POS, although it still might only amount to four, unless one totally contradicts himself and his earlier writings, not a surprise for one who has no soul.

@youllis
8 months ago

Is Trump in jail yet for his Trumpsurrection? #putputinspuppyinthepound

@larryforman5642
8 months ago

Should send Trump to jail.

@rachelgarcia732
8 months ago

Lock Trump up already 😡

@betherealdeal
8 months ago

Jack Smith, keep your pimp hand strong!
Slap DJT like a bitch that he is!

@Mozartrat-ig6kg
8 months ago

Thanks Ben💙Ⓜ️Ⓜ️💙

@tsomer07
8 months ago

If they rule for Smith, Obama isn't above the law either. First step: identity fraud. Gather the DNA now. Then…

@frankfeatherstone8976
8 months ago

From here on out, Judgments by the Supreme Court could well decide their own future existence in a future Trump Term.

@camwyn256
8 months ago

Do it, SCOTUS. Grant Trump absolute immunity. Then the 2024 election doesn't matter. Biden can just stay president and nothing could be done about it

@garethbuckley8700
8 months ago

I'm from Britain so forgive me if I've got this wrong. Trump is using the American Constitution as a defence even though he's threatened to tear up the same Constitution if he gets back into office?

@DrKim503
8 months ago

Ben, you always say you are giving it to us straight, no BS, no convenient omissions. Well, the word that team Trump is relying on in the Impeachment clause is "convicted"; that a president "convicted" is nevertheless subject to criminal prosecution. I'm not saying I agree, but I want to know, what is the response to that part of their argument that you conveniently omitted?

@DrKim503
8 months ago

Someone, please reassure me there is something to prevent team Trump from intentionally causing a mistrial.

@DrKim503
8 months ago

What possible opposition could team Trump claim against expediting a resolution? "We believe he is absolutely immune, that he suffers irreversible damage with ongoing litigation, but take your time, we're not in a hurry for relief"?? Sounds like a surefire loser.

@DrKim503
8 months ago

Remember, the reason we are in this constitutional crisis is because Senate Republicans FAILED to do their duty during Trump's second impeachment when they had the opportunity and responsibility to ban Trump from holding office again.