Samuel Jackson: Tarantino cannot be considered racist (Jan. 6, 2016) | Charlie Rose

Posted by



On January 6, 2016, Samuel L. Jackson appeared on the Charlie Rose show to discuss his recent work and share his thoughts on the controversy surrounding Quentin Tarantino and accusations of racism in his films. Jackson, who has appeared in several of Tarantino’s films, staunchly defended his longtime collaborator, stating that it is “impossible” for Tarantino to be racist.

In the interview, Jackson made a compelling argument for why he believes Tarantino is not a racist. He pointed out that Tarantino is a filmmaker who pushes boundaries and challenges the status quo through his work, often addressing difficult and controversial subject matter. Jackson emphasized that Tarantino’s films are not meant to promote racism, but rather to shine a light on societal issues and spark important conversations about race and discrimination.

Jackson also highlighted the diversity of Tarantino’s films, noting the wide range of characters and storylines he has explored throughout his career. From the African American slave protagonist in “Django Unchained” to the diverse ensemble cast in “Pulp Fiction,” Tarantino has made a conscious effort to include people of color in his films and give them important and multi-dimensional roles. Jackson praised Tarantino for his commitment to diversity, stating that he has always been supportive of actors of color and has helped further their careers in Hollywood.

Moreover, Jackson pointed out that Tarantino’s use of racial slurs in his films is not meant to glorify or promote racism, but rather to accurately depict the language and attitudes of the time period in which the films are set. By portraying racism in a realistic and unfiltered way, Tarantino forces audiences to confront the ugly truths of history and examine their own biases and prejudices. Jackson argued that this raw and unflinching portrayal of racism is what sets Tarantino apart as a filmmaker and makes his work so powerful and impactful.

In conclusion, Samuel L. Jackson’s interview on the Charlie Rose show shed light on the controversy surrounding Quentin Tarantino and accusations of racism in his films. Jackson adamantly defended Tarantino, asserting that it is “impossible” for him to be racist given his commitment to diversity and his willingness to address difficult subject matter in his work. By challenging audiences to confront the uncomfortable truths of history and sparking important conversations about race and discrimination, Tarantino has established himself as a groundbreaking filmmaker whose impact will be felt for generations to come.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Leave a Reply

45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
@modaljazz59
15 days ago

Yall yet to learn the difference between clock hands sands trademark stamps.

@andyzhang7890
15 days ago

it’s ironic that Tarantino, with all his swearing, sex, and violence, that he of all people always makes sure his characters always have humanity to them however good or bad they are

@KennethBostonian
15 days ago

I cannot find the glasses that he’s wearing who makes them and what are they?

@programaticLearning
15 days ago

"Leonardo the filming stopped 3 weeks ago you can stop calling me that now". – Samuel L Jackson

@willcorker763
15 days ago

For Pulp Fiction, there's a fan theory that Jules and Jimmy are related since Jimmy's wife is also black. The idea is that's why Jimmy is comfortable saying the N word around Jules.

@Zapzipzoop16
15 days ago

It’s honestly kinda racist though to ALWAYS make Sam Jackson play a black character? 😡

@francofernandes2006
15 days ago

"Quentin, you can't make a slave the villain in movie about slavery."
"Fucking WATCH ME."

@fundifferent1
15 days ago

He might not be racist but he has a very weird obsession with race and racism. Just like feet, he fetishizes it equally.

@oneyedthing
15 days ago

Sam was having 5 mins screen time per movie until Tarantino put him in Pulp Fiction

@GiffBeatsVegas
15 days ago

True

@sam23696
15 days ago

Back when people wrote scripts with adult themes made for adults, and wasn't some agenda they would trying to force you to swallow.

@vincentmarotta9800
15 days ago

I think what Jackson is tapping in to here is: For Tarantino to give the sort of personality and depth to his characters as he does, he believes a racist can't see the human side of a black person enough to be able to do that in the first place.
I'd argue the ONLY way you can create compelling characters isn't through making them representative of a particular race, sex, or baseline category….but rather….you can only do it through adequately exploring the nuances of a given character's individual personality. That's hard, but audiences appreciate it….while punishing when it's not.

@lebrewski3103
15 days ago

There's people out there who hate some actor just for playing a despicable character too well.

@Stubby1085
15 days ago

He isn’t wrong. A true racist would never let an African American character have the dignity and intelligence that his characters have had.

@vatoloco1653
15 days ago

Well technically he is since he’s a zionist

@Brandoons88
15 days ago

You tell em Mr Jackson

@FL3MZA
15 days ago

why, because he has black friends?

@user-nr5tj4iv8l
15 days ago

Если я напишу мистера голубого что будет😂😂😂 😮 Он не адольф…

@an0ny_asher131
15 days ago

well well well guess who's a zionist T_T

@Neags
15 days ago

I want to know what stuff he edited out of Django, #releasethetarantinocut

45
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x