Trump’s Pardon of Kushner Friend is a Preview of “Tough on Crime” Presidency

President Trump’s recent pardon of his longtime ally and son-in-law Jared Kushner’s friend, Ken Kurson, has sparked controversy and raised concerns about his approach to criminal justice. This move is just one example of Trump’s “tough on crime” presidency, which many critics argue is not only unfair but also undermines the principles of justice and accountability.

Kurson, a former editor of the New York Observer and a close friend of Kushner, was charged with cyberstalking and harassment in October 2020. These charges arose from allegations that he had surveilled and harassed a former friend and business partner. Despite these serious allegations, Trump decided to pardon Kurson, citing his “impressive record of leadership, charity, and philanthropy.”

While it is not uncommon for presidents to use their pardon power to grant clemency to friends and allies, Trump’s decision to pardon Kurson is emblematic of his broader approach to criminal justice. Throughout his presidency, Trump has repeatedly signaled a commitment to being “tough on crime,” often at the expense of due process and fairness.

This approach has been reflected in a number of policies and actions, including his support for harsh sentencing laws, aggressive immigration enforcement, and the use of federal forces to suppress protests. Trump has also consistently praised and pardoned individuals who have been convicted of or charged with crimes, often for political reasons or personal loyalty.

The president’s “tough on crime” stance has drawn criticism from advocacy groups, legal experts, and civil rights organizations, who argue that it is discriminatory, punitive, and excessive. They argue that this approach not only perpetuates systemic inequalities and injustices within the criminal justice system but also undermines the rule of law and equitable treatment under it.

Moreover, Trump’s use of his pardon power to benefit his friends and allies has raised concerns about potential abuse of power and conflicts of interest. Critics argue that these actions erode the public’s trust in the president and the integrity of the pardon process, as they appear to be driven by personal and political considerations rather than legal and ethical ones.

In light of these concerns, Trump’s pardon of Kurson is a troubling indication of his approach to criminal justice. It signals a disregard for fair and impartial justice, and a preference for favoritism and impunity. As the president’s term comes to an end, it is essential for the American public and lawmakers to reflect on the consequences of a “tough on crime” presidency and to advocate for a justice system that is rooted in equality, fairness, and accountability.